Further Evidence

Masten, Jeffrey. Textual intercourse: collaboration, authorship and sexualities in Renaissance drama. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008.

Here is the Free Google Preview

 

This book, the Textual intercourse, focuses on potential stories of Homosexual men within the 1600’s, prior to accurate and long-lasting note takings. It examines not only different languages use to represent the act of homosexual activities, but also reviews them with a sense that what they, the authors of the various publications, are hinting or even almost directly speaking about. This book even writes about the hierarchy of relationships, aligning male friendships even before those of a man and wife’s married or unmarried affairs, further proving the point that if there were relations between people who were not just men, it wasn’t written or talked about, which then makes future writings in our current time from Art Historians all that more complicated.

 

Yet ,with this in mind, can we, as people who review and examine art works for themselves, without direct author explaination, take slight hints to an artist’s alternative sexuality? Can we determine, from an exposed shoulder, or an adulterous glare from the main figure, that the artist was more interested in their models?
Reviewing these, I can see that myself, interpreting a person’s sexuality dependent on their works is almost impossible. However the lack of even an attempt for any of the few female creators in the earlier centuries just shows the hardening of the patriarchal society oppression.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s